The media has been buzzing all day about THAT menu. The
mock menu allegedly created for a Mal Brough fundraiser back in March. The menu
that refers to a number of Labor MPs, but specifically to Prime Minister Julia
Gillard in less-than-flattering terms.
And by "media", I mean ALL the media.
Newspapers. TV. Social media. Radio. It's been everywhere, and other stories
(such as the 260 Target workers made redundant in Geelong) have slipped through
the cracks.
This evening, there was a twist. Apparently Joe Richards,
the owner of the restaurant where the fundraiser was held, has claimed responsibility for the menu, and says it was an "in-joke" that was
not used at the fundraiser.
As reported on The Age website only a couple of hours
ago (at 7:46 pm, to be precise), Richards wrote a letter to Brough explaining the situation after seeing it
reported on the evening news.
Bullshit. Here's why.
At midday, this story was released on the ABC website, written
by Latika Bourke. "Liberal National Party candidate Mal Brough apologises
for 'offensive and sexist' menu which mocked Julia Gillard's body" the
headline screamed.
The third paragraph of the article states:
Mr Brough says the menu was drawn up by a non-party
member who thought it would be "humorous" and "didn't mean any
harm by it," but is now "deeply apologetic".
So. At midday, Brough was aware that the menu had been
drawn up by a non-party member, who was now deeply apologetic.
How could Brough have known this, if Richards didn't
write to him until later in the day?
Remember, Richards didn't write his letter to Brough
until after seeing the story on the evening news.
And in his letter, which was subsequently distributed by
the LNP, he stated the following:
As you know no one at the dinner was privy to such a
menu, and it is so unfortunate that an in-house joke between myself and my son
has caused you great problems and embarrassment.
How, then, could Brough have known that Richards, a
non-party member, was responsible for the menu when the ABC article was
published at midday?
It doesn't add up.
Brough made statements, reported at midday, containing
details that he couldn't have known until later in the day... if he and
Richards are to be believed.
I'll let you be the judge of that.
It all smells too too convenient. And Brough has form in the papering-over business ... This will come back to bite Abbott in government. Brough will be the first head to roll ... during 2014.
ReplyDeleteBusiness owner where a party fundraiser was held (who would have been paid by said party) defends the party who organised it. This is after the candidate apologises for something he now knows nothing about. Smell a rat? I do...Brough has yet to explain why he was up to his arm pits in stitching up his opponent, Mr Slipper...
ReplyDeleteA member of their staff has now confirmed that this menu was indeed distributed to all attendees at the Restaurant on the night. The staff member has resigned in disgust over this incident. This incident is a sad indictment of a party that may be in power next year.
ReplyDelete